🔮Madjik

Risk Simulation (VaR) (M50022)

Metric IDM50022
CategoryQC
Accesspublic
Classificationproprietary
Tierenterprise
ComputationQuantum (simulated) + Quantum (hardware)
Computed byBlack Belt Labs
Freshnessfresh

This is a proprietary Madjik metric. Its methodology is a trade secret; the values are available through the API.

Quantum configuration

Every quantum calculation of this metric, with the machine and circuit setup it runs on. Hardware values come from real IBM quantum computers; simulator values from a classical simulation of the same kind of circuit.

MethodQuantum computing on hardware (quant-hw)
ProviderIBM Quantum Platform (Open plan)
Machineibm_marrakesh (156 qubits)
Machine typesuperconducting QPU (IBM Heron)
Qubits used4
Circuits per run1
Shots per run2,048
Circuit depth17
Two-qubit gates3
Gate basiscz, rz, sx, x (IBM Heron native)
Algorithmquantum-circuit Monte Carlo of daily returns at the current implied volatility
Profilefull
Error mitigationdynamical decoupling + measurement twirling; no post-hoc correction
Hardware runs2
Last run2026-10-05T06:30:47
IBM job iddb1k3beegvvc73bho98g
How measuredIBM job record (transpiled circuit stats)
MethodQuantum computing simulated (quant-sim)
ProviderQiskit Aer simulator (IBM open-source software) on Google Cloud
Machineaer_simulator
Machine typeclassical simulator (CPU, noise-free)
Qubits used4
Circuits per run1
Shots per run2,048
Circuit depth5
Two-qubit gates3
Gate basisu, cx (Aer, flattened)
Algorithmquantum-circuit Monte Carlo of daily returns at the current implied volatility
Profilenative (primary) circuit
Error mitigationnone (noise-free simulation)
How measuredrecorded circuits, compiled to u/cx
Noteprimary value of the metric: this circuit is the published quant-sim calculation

Personal metrics: figures are the maximum across submitted portfolios (circuit size follows portfolio size). Machine qubits is the size of the whole chip; qubits used is what this calculation needs.

Method comparison (experimental)

The same metric computed several ways on the same frozen inputs, one change at a time, so a gap between two rows has a known cause. Each plus/minus is the standard error of that value. How to read this, and how it scales.

Daily simulator-only comparison

Snapshot 20261008T1305_2f7e5def · 2026-10-08 13:05 UTC

StepMethodValue
Classical, exactclassical—
Quantum simulator, idealquantum simulated73
Quantum simulator, sampledquantum simulated73
Noisy device modelquantum simulated73 ± 1.878

Scored against what actually happened

Daily VaR99. Outcome: BTC's next-24h return. A VaR99 should be exceeded about 1% of the time.

MethodResult
quantum hardware0 exceedances in 1 forecasts (0.0%; target 1%); mean VaR 5.8%
quantum simulated0 exceedances in 25 forecasts (0.0%; target 1%); mean VaR 5.2%

Quantum values are not expected to beat the classical value at these problem sizes. The purpose of this section is to show, with uncertainty, how and why the methods differ. Small samples: treat scores as indicative.

Hypotheses monitored by this metric

Access this metric

Query it via the Madjik API:

curl -H "X-API-Key: $MADJIK_API_KEY" \
  https://api.madjik.io/v1/metrics/M50022

🚀 Get API Access Now   API documentation