Test copy-paste
💡
Hypothesis HY10019
Every trading model that looks great in backtests fails in live trading. Past performance doesn't predict future results - especially in crypto where market structure changes constantly.
Trading hypothesis
What traders get wrong
False assumption:
"My model has great backtested returns."
Truth:
Back-tested models don't work because they're optimized for past conditions, regimes change, and survivorship bias misleads.
Problem for trader:
That 500% backtested return means nothing. Models overfit. Edge decays.
Key takeaways
What you should consider as a trader
- Overfitting is the norm - Any model can fit historical data.
- Crypto regime changes are frequent - 2021 model fails in 2022.
- LLMs are backward-looking - They don't know current conditions.
- Alpha decays - Once discovered, edges disappear.
- Real-time adaptation is essential - Static models fail.
Data you need
"Better to be approximately right than precisely wrong"
Build adaptive models:
Data points:
- Regime indicator
- Model performance decay
- Out-of-sample performance
- Structural break detection
Comparison of data sources
Where to get crucial data feeds
ChatGPT/Claude
Data available: ❌ No
Knowledge cutoffs, no real-time data.
QuantConnect
Data available: ⚠️ Partial
Backtesting only.
Madjik
Data available: ✅ Yes
Get access to this data immediately.
Use yourself, or pass on to your software engineer. Or to your AI model - or to your boss.
Science behind hypothesis
Research supports this hypothesis
Research shows ML models overfit to backtests and fail in production.